OK Tangnefedd, let us not discriminate against the second, third or fourth child of a family anymore. How dare we discriminate based on when one was born into a family. This is just a case of stirring up the pot unnecessarily. I mean when was the last time a first born women was passed over for the first born son?
I predict that this is going to be trouble. What is, works. There is discrimination that should be fought because of the real harm it produces. I give you as an example on reservation wives over here. They have no property rights. A native husband on reservation can toss his wife out of the house and divorce her and leave her with absolutely nothing. She has no property rights at all. Our conservative government has been fighting to change this injustice but low and behold, guess who is fighting against this change? The socialists, liberals and separatists in our house of commons. Why? Because the male dominated leadership on the reservations does not want women to gain these rights. Something is so rotten with this picture. Normally it's the left who is seen as women's champions but not in this instance. The left does not want the government to force a correction on an injustice. Why? Because the left lives in a constant guilty haze on aboriginal issues.