As a British lass - I can't see why it has to be the first born male - when obviously a female is equally capable of being monarch. At present the rules do seem to be outdated (IMO)
well - As a British lad - I can't see why it has to be the first born male (either!) - when obviously a female is equally capable of being monarch. At present the rules do seem to be outdated (IMO)  :-)

lol 

Women make great monarchs. For example our present Queen, Victoria, Elizabeth the first. My people the Cree called Victoria the Great White Mother. I'm saying that that change won't stop there. Why discriminate against the second, third or fourth? Some of them have been our greatest monarchs. Being an aboriginal I admit to being biased about following tradition.

Hi there pow wow - I am not really seeing it as discriminating against the third or fourth - just that first born is first born - whether male or female - it has to be someone 

Change in general doesn't stop really - some might call it 'progression'