Message #3319

[Martin]

Those links I have commneted on, I have substatially read, some I have read in full, and I have commented on those links which should show you that I have read them, and investigated them when you clearly haven't investigated them yourself.

The problem is, Jan, that it takes time to read all the stuff you post, and when, after reading the first few, I find them to be totally without substance, I am not going to continue reading and reading and reading and reading.  I've given you a far longer hearing than most objective people would, I've spent well over an hour and a half today alone, and I have still found nothing, zilch, zero in any of what I have read that in any way contradicts what I'm saying:

There is no properly controlled scientific evidence for the existence of a soul.

Pick your best, incontovertable example that disproves the statement above, and we can all read it in full and respond to it.  You only need one incontrovertable example, not several examples that don't fit the bill.