Author Topic: Injunctions  (Read 136 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ecuworrier

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 690
    • View Profile
Re: Injunctions
« on: May 24, 2011, 19:12:49 »
missed the liverpool player's revelations.. though did wonder who Henning lib dem MP ? supports.... though apparently only non twitter readers would not know that Ryan Giggs was the secret not so secret culprit....

as far as RG is concerned yes indeed he has been given thyis squeeky clean model image ... i think the place that it would most be of public interest is that he is mr ambassador of some children's charity.... so cavorting with miss **** reality tv celeb might call that into question...

it is an interesting as well as thoroughly boring issue... for me the main question is not about whether the tabloids get carried away on whatever they think will sell papers! though it would be thoroughly decent to ban gossip from the media ...oops there goes the entire sports coverage (BRILL!!!)

but what really serves the public interest it all seems a bit arbitrary really...

like ok so if we found out RBS director was having a relationship with a colleague before RBS got shown up for their mess what can we do about it? surely that is an internal matter?  now RBS is public property i guess we can all be as confused about the fuss as shocked.... nobody has directly suggested that the whole RBS crisis has directly been cos of that alleged affair .. though there seems to be some question about judgement yeah but there seems to have been an endemic  culture of bad judgement and me is not convinced things is better... i mean if the press was doin it's job properly then surely we would have better judgemetn on these matters cos we would have a better understanding of why we should care!

GOD BLESS!

Peace and Love,